Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered is landing on PC, and it’s pretty good! Co-developers Insomniac Games and Nixxes, who spoke to me this week about the port's development, have also taken the care to festoon this version of the open-world crim-puncher with various Windows-exclusive features. These span enhanced ray traced reflections and ultrawide monitor support to both Nvidia DLSS and (surprisingly, given it wasn’t in the initial PC features trailer) AMD FSR 2.0, adding to a list of visual options that already stretches into the sky like a Manhattan high rise. Let’s take a look, then, at how Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered performs on PC – as well as the best settings to keep it swingin’ real smooth like.
Like God of War, Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered is based on the touched-up PS5 version of a PS4 original, with further tweaks to make it look and play like a proper PC game. So besides the graphics stuff there’s also mouse and keyboard support, Steam/Epic Store achievements and the like. It’s even earned Verified status on the Steam Deck, though we’ll be focusing on desktop performance here; Liam, possibly with an eye on stealing my job and identity, has already checked out Deck performance specifically. Here, we'll begin with a reminder of Spidey’s myriad of minimum and recommended specs…
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered PC system requirements
Nixxes haven’t skimped on details for suggested PC specs, and they don’t half get ambitious towards the higher end. Fortunately, latest and best graphics cards aren’t demanded for lower resolutions.
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered Minimum PC specs (720p / 30fps)
- GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 “or AMD equivalent”
- CPU: Intel Core i3-4160 “or AMD equivalent”
- RAM: 8GB
- OS: Windows 10 64-bit
- Storage: 75GB HDD
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered Recommended PC specs (1080p / 60fps)
- GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB / AMD Radeon RX 580
- CPU: Intel Core i5-4670 / AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- RAM: 16GB
- OS: Windows 10 64-bit
- Storage: 75GB SSD
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered Very High PC specs (4K / 60fps)
- GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 / AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- CPU: Intel Core i5-11400 / AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- RAM: 16GB
- OS: Windows 10 64-bit
- Storage: 75GB SSD
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered Amazing Ray Tracing specs (1440p / 60fps)
- GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 / AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- CPU: Intel Core i5 11600K / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- RAM: 16GB
- OS: Windows 10 64-bit
- Storage: 75GB SSD
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered Ultimate Ray tracing specs (4K / 60fps)
- GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 / AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
- CPU: Intel Core i7-12700K / AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- RAM: 32GB
- OS: Windows 10 64-bit
- Storage: 75GB SSD
This is (I believe) the first time a processor from Intel’s 12th Gen range has appeared in a recommend specs list for a major PC release: a minor milestone for some of the best gaming CPUs around. It’s only for the highest 4K / 60fps spec, though, and having tested this resolution on lesser hardware, I reckon you don’t have to worry if you’re a bit short of these official listings.
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered PC performance
That being said, those specs can be fairly accurate guides to performance. For instance, I tried the GTX 1060 at 1080p with the Medium quality preset – as per the “Recommended” specs list - and it averaged 76fps, not 60fps. However, I was using it with an Intel Core i5-11600K, a major upgrade on the same list’s suggested CPUs, and switching to High quality dropped the average to 61fps. That’s more than merely playable too, of course, and the same setup also produced 52fps at Medium quality at 1440p, so it’s a decent match for Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered at the most popular resolutions.
I also tested a GTX 1050 Ti, to see how low-end hardware could cope. This was playable too at 1080p, albeit with a much more modest 49fps at 1080p/Medium, again with a relatively more powerful CPU that what it would likely pair with in the wild. There's still plenty of daylight between this and the 30fps minimum, mind.(Side note: All of these results were collected after installing the August 10th pre-release patch, which should - unless another one releases in the next few hours - represent the game's performance when it launches on the 12th. This patch measurably improved performance on lower-end GPUs, with upscaling and ray tracing also performing better than I'd recorded on previous versions.)
I ended up performing the bulk of my testing on the RTX 3070, as it could handle the enticing new ray tracing and upscaling features; Radeon RX 6000 GPUs will support ray tracing and FSR 2.0, but as ever you’ll need an Nvidia GeForce RTX model for DLSS. Nvidia's card proved comfortable at 1440p, pumping out 100fps on Very High and 107fps on High. With the addition of ray traced reflections, on their own default quality settings, that 107fps dipped to 88fps. Which sounds like a lot, but doesn’t reflect the utter performance-gutting that some games suffer once RT effects are turned on.
Admittedly, that’s partly because ray traced reflections are the only ray tracing gubbins to make it in; shadows and general lighting use cheaper, more traditional techniques. How there are plenty of opportunities to admire those reflections, given New York is a city made largely out of glass, and the much-memed puddles of Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered do add an attractively rain-slicked look to the streets you’re swinging over.
In fact, Insomniac’s take on the Big Apple is inarguably one of the best-looking, most densely detailed urban open worlds yet committed to PC gamesdom. Every rooftop and graffiti-coated alleyway has an attentive, handcrafted quality to it, and a mix of bespoke and semi-randomly generated building interiors helps maintain the feeling of swinging through a lived-in place and not just a well-dressed set.
The are peaks and troughs to performance as you thwip through different parts of the city, and you will probably see FPS inconsistencies as you transition between narrow alleyways to sprawling rooftop views. Them's the breaks with open world games, though, and for what it's worth, framerates are generally more stable on the most recenmt patch than they were when I first played the game last week. Similarly, the few graphical glitches and crash issues I bumped into have been almost entirely cleaned up. The game still sometimes freezes when changing the graphics preset option, but that's hopefully a simple fix.
The upscalers could do with a bit more work as well, sadly. It's not that DLSS and FSR are ugly (they're not), but they don't yet provide the same kind of performance boost that I've come to expect from other other supporting games. Especially with ray tracing turned on, which is basically when such a speed boost would be most welcome.
Fingers crossed that they can improve with future updates, especially because Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered get so much else right about its jump to PC. Mouse and keyboard controls are workable and customisable, there’s Xbox controller support (with the correct on-screen button prompts) as an alternative to the PS5 DualSense, and it comes fully adapted for 21:9 and 32:9 ultrawide monitors. That includes cutscenes (see the above screenshot – spoiler warning, Spider-Man touches a camera), and if you’re unhinged enough to play at even wider aspect ratios, outer edges will be filled with a blurred extension of the main image: a less ugly workaround to the usual black bars.
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered: the best settings to use
I’ll be using the RTX 3070, running at 1440p, as the main test subject for this game’s 27(!) different graphics options. In other words, we’re trying to improve on that card’s 100fps result on the Very High preset, by finessing the individual options. Your own results will vary by hardware but any changes from the presets should be broadly proportional.The RTX 3070 will also let us see how all the different ray tracing and upscaling settings work, including both DLSS and FSR; the latter works on any graphics card. And speaking of which, these just happen to be first in the list…
Upscale method: Depending on your graphics card, you might have access to DLSS, FSR 2.0, and/or Insomniac Games Temporal Injection (IGTI). This last one is a basic spatial upscalers, whereas DLSS and FSR are a bit smarter in how they piece frames together to recreate higher resolutions.
Upscale quality: With your upscaler selected, you can select a quality level. Try to avoid dropping below the ‘Balanced’ level, for image quality’s sake, and I found the best performers here were DLSS Balanced (123fps) and IGTI Balanced (124fps). FSR Balanced wasn’t far behind, though, averaging 119fps – a 19% improvement.
At the highest ‘Quality’ setting, DLSS and FSR both produced 117fps, with IGTI edging to 118fps. Of the lot, I’d say DLSS Balanced provides the best combo of sharpness and speed, and since FSR looks slightly cleaner than IGTI, I’d sooner use AMD’s tech over Insomniac’s as an alternative.
Dynamic resolution scaling: If enabled, this will automatically drop the game’s render resolution so that performance stays above your chosen threshold (30fps, 45fps or 60fps) during busy moments when it would otherwise drop below. Permanently changing quality settings is usually the better route to a high framerate, so you can probably ignore this, though it is cool how dynamic scaling works with your chosen upscaler – reducing the suddenness of resolution drops that you typically get with DRS.
Anti-aliasing: By default, this uses a respectable TAA implementation. The SMAA option was 4% faster on my RTX 3070, but looked noticeably jaggier, whereas Nvidia DLAA averaged an identical 100fps. Since DLAA is sharper than TAA, you therefore might as well use it instead, provided that a) you have a compatible RTX graphics card and b) you’re not using DLSS instead.
Preset: On hardware like the RTX 3070, there’s actually not a truly huge performance difference between the Very High preset and Very Low (100fps from the former, 128fps from the latter). But Medium, Low, and Very Low all perform similarly to one another, leaving a comparatively sizeable gap between Medium (120fps) and High (107fps). As such, lowering individual settings to Medium makes the most sense, as dropping any further will make Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered look worse without also having it perform much better.
Texture quality: Case in point, dropping from Very High textures to Medium got my test rig up to 107fps, a 7% increase. That’s one of the larger jumps for a single setting, and visually, the impact is hardly jarring.
Texture filtering: This is another good one to lower. Switching from 8x anisotropic to 2x produced a 6% improvement, and lets you avoid the trilinear setting, which runs fast but adds an ugly blur to angled surfaces.
Shadow quality: Unusually, you’re best off raising this setting. There are two reasons: one, the Very High shadows setting can only be enabled manually, and two, it doesn’t run any slower than the High setting. In fact, I averaged 103fps when I tried it. That might be margin-of-error territory, but at least it shows that the PC version’s enhanced shadows don’t come at any real performance cost.
Ambient occlusion: The Very High preset sets AO effects to HBAO+, but not only does the SSAO setting perform better – providing 13% more frames, just by itself – but to my eyes it looks better too. SSAO’s corner-darkening is more forceful than that of HBAO+, so technically isn’t the more ‘realistic’ option, but the starker contrast between light and shadowed surfaces is nice.
Screen space reflections: Turning this off got me 6% better performance, but that comes at the cost of any halfway decent reflections, which frankly isn’t worth it. New York just looks better with more reflective glass and puddles, though that’s also why you may want to disable screen space reflections in favour of…
Ray traced reflections: Windows, puddles, polished floors, passing cars, they all look better with some traced rays. This specific setting enables or disables RT reflections; tinker with the three following settings to manage them.
Reflection resolution: Essentially, this is the quality level of any ray-traced reflected objects you can see. There are only two settings, High and Very High; with all other settings either on default or under the Very High preset, High averaged 63fps and Very High averaged 54fps. These are sharp drops from the usual 100fps, so use with caution, and while Very High’s reflections are indeed sharper and cleaner I’d recommend sticking with High instead. It’s still a loping step up from simple screen space reflections, which only reflect what’s already being rendered onscreen, and don't even seem to be applied to as many different surfaces as ray tracing.
Geometry detail: The second ray tracing quality setting, this time determining the object detail level for reflected entities. To be honest, you’d have to stop swinging for a moment and look really hard to see much of a difference, though since I got 63fps from the High setting and 62fps from Very High… I mean you might as well go with Very High, right?
Object range: This determines the distance at which objects are visible in reflected surfaces. Distance is judged from the camera, not the surface, so I wouldn’t suggest dropping this value below the default of 6. Otherwise, you might notice pop-in reflections forming on distant puddles, for instance. That said, there’s not much to gain from whacking object range up to its maximum setting either; using the Very High preset, this produced the same 63fps average as the default range, but in another test I tried using the High preset instead, and dropped from 88fps to 70fps.
Level of detail: Back onto the regular option, this is basically a geometry detail setting – the higher the setting, the further the distance at which certain environmental details will become visible. Medium only performed 3% better than High, but also wasn’t a particularly noticeable visual downgrade.
Traffic density: You should be able to leave this turned up, as lowering it from High to Medium only got me a lousy 2fps extra.
Crowd density: Same again, leave this up. The Medium setting gave me all of one extra frame per second, and the Low setting only bumped that up to 2fps.
Hair quality: Not even sure why this is here, as lowering it from High to Medium didn’t improve performance for me at all.
Weather particle quality: Although changing this setting doesn’t make much of a visible difference, even while New York is getting some drizzle, I found that lowering it down to Medium gave a tasty 13fps performance boost. Sure, why not.
Depth of field: Normally, this is a vanity option in games, but disabling it in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered did at least give me a modest 4% extra performance.
Bloom: Nothing wrong with bloom effects sometimes, though disabling them could give you 3% more frames per second, like it did me.
Lens flares: Another visual sweetener you can ditch for 3% faster performance.
Chromatic aberration: Yet again, 3% more frames were up for grabs after I turned this off. More noticeably, this gets rid of the soft focus effect that covers a good portion of the screen edges, and I can’t say I missed it.
Vignette: This darkens the edges (and unlike chromatic aberration, only the edges) for a more film-y look. Turn it off if you want, though doing so only gave me 1fps extra.
Motion blur strength: Normally I’m no fan of motion blur in PC games, where there’s less need of it to mask poor performance. However, Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered is one of the few games that gets some good stylistic use out of it, and swinging felt just a little less fun without the world literally going by in a blur. Nonetheless, if you want to turn it off, you should know that I did get an extra 4% to performance with it on the lowest end of the slider.
Field of view: Set to taste. The tightest FoV setting actually boosted the RTX 3070’s performance by 8%, though was far less comfortable to play.
Film grain strength: This game’s film grain is so subtle I wasn’t even sure of success when I pushed it to the lowest possible setting. But I did, and it got me an extra 4% to performance, so it’s one to consider if you’re in need of frames.
Cripes, that’s a lot. But I think the following are the best settings for a healthy balance of FPS speed and visual richness:
- All settings on High preset selections, except:
- Anti-aliasing: TAA (or DLAA if your GPU supports it)
- Texture quality: Medium
- Texture filtering: 2x anisotropic
- Shadow quality: Very High
- Level of detail: Medium
- Weather particle quality: Medium
- Depth of field: Medium
- Bloom: Off
- Lens flares: Off
- Chromatic aberration: Off
- Film grain strength: 0
This combination produced an average of 126fps on my RTX 3070 setup, so you’d be getting visuals that lay between the High and Medium presets, with performance that surpasses both. And, as a bonus, the extra shadow quality that’s only available on PC.
Adding DLSS Balanced to the mix got me 135fps (a 35% increase over Very High with TAA). Enabling ray tracing – with reflection resolution on High, geometry detail at Very High and object range at 6 – dropped the average from 126fps to 91fps, but that’s not such a big loss compared to the same settings used with the Very High preset.
Frustratingly, combining DLSS Balanced with these ray tracing settings wouldn’t improve performance past 94fps; the former is much more effective without ray tracing off, so I’m concerned that enabling both might break something on the upscaling side that needs to be fixed post-launch. Truth be told, there’s room for both DLSS and FSR 2.0 to improve further, as they already have done in the early patches I’ve had to install.
Otherwise, though, Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered is plenty adequate as a PC port. Despite some occasionally scary system requirements it will run fine on weak hardware, and is capable of juggling fancy tech with smooth performance on high-tier gear as well.